TL;DR
Turn quiet afternoons into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A Sixty and Me report describes potential, choice and purpose as three skills that may help people live well amid adversity. Its account draws on interviews and personal stories; it does not present new research testing whether the skills improve wellbeing.
Sixty and Me has published a report identifying potential, choice and purpose as three skills people can draw on while living through adversity. Based on the author’s interviews with people who faced loss and other challenges, the article presents these skills as practical ways to build resilience, rather than findings from a new controlled study.
The report’s author says the project began as a series of interviews with people experiencing different challenges and losses, and later informed the book Living Well Despite Adversity: Inspiration for Finding Renewed, Meaning, and Joy in Your Life. The article describes its three proposed skills through interviewees’ experiences and the author’s observations.
Potential means resisting the idea that a hardship defines a person’s limits. The report quotes Gabriel Gordell, who traveled 3,000 miles in 99 days using a manual wheelchair: “It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.” The article links this outlook to problem-solving and the belief that people can continue to grow.
Choice refers to deciding how to respond to circumstances, not choosing the hardship itself. The report quotes Sherri Mandell, writing about the murder of her son Koby: “Each day I have to work to go on; each day I decide to live.” It also names purpose as a way to find meaning after disruption. Julia Fox Garrison, described as having survived a near-fatal stroke at 37, says: “What I need to do is impact someone in a positive way every single day.”
Skills for Coping With Hardship
The article addresses a common concern: how to keep a sense of direction when loss, illness or other difficulties cannot simply be changed. Its focus on response, growth and meaning offers readers a framework for thinking about coping without suggesting that people can control every outcome.
That distinction matters. Describing choice as a coping skill does not mean a person is responsible for adverse events or can overcome them through attitude alone. The report acknowledges that hardship can bring grief and pain. Its examples illustrate individual experiences; they do not establish that the same approach will work for everyone.
Products Worth Considering
Withings BPM Vision Blood Pressure Monitor with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Smartwatch, 43 mm, Black
Therabody Theragun Relief Massage Gun, 3 Speeds, Navy
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Report’s Happiness Framework
The article challenges the assumption that happiness rises and falls in direct proportion to external circumstances. It invokes research attributed to psychology professor Sonja Lyubomirsky, presenting a commonly cited breakdown in which circumstances account for 10% of happiness, genetics for 50% and intentional behavior for 40%.
The supplied article does not give a study title, publication date or methodological detail for that breakdown. It should therefore be understood as a claim the report attributes to Lyubomirsky, not as a new result established by the interviews. The report also describes resilience as a skillset that can be developed, comparing its growth to strengthening a muscle.
“It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
— Gabriel Gordell, as quoted in the Sixty and Me report
Limits of the Evidence Presented
The source is a personal report built around interviews and reflection, not a described clinical trial or systematic review. It does not provide details about how interviewees were selected, how their experiences were assessed, or whether the three skills were evaluated against measurable wellbeing outcomes.
The article also does not specify when it was published in the supplied material. The basis and limits of the happiness percentages are not explained there. Readers should not take the examples as proof that a particular mindset will prevent distress or replace professional support.
Applying the Ideas to Daily Life
The report closes by inviting readers to reflect on what helps them live through challenges, whether they have found meaning amid pain and how they are building resilience. It does not announce a formal program, follow-up study or next publication, so no further research milestone is confirmed.
For readers, the article’s immediate next step is reflection rather than a prescribed intervention: identify areas where a response may be within their control, consider sources of purpose, and recognize that support may also be needed. The report does not claim that these steps remove hardship or grief.
Key Questions
What three skills does the report identify?
It names potential, choice and purpose as skills people may draw on while facing adversity.
Is the article based on a new scientific study?
No new study is described. The report says its ideas draw on interviews, personal observations and research it attributes to psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky.
What does the report mean by choice?
It means choosing how to respond to difficult circumstances, not choosing or controlling the hardship itself.
Does the report show that these skills work for everyone?
No. It offers examples and a framework, but the supplied source does not report testing the skills across a representative group or measuring their effects.
Source: sixtyandme.com
